The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts illustrate what UK students who were graduated and post-graduated not to go into full-time work did after finishing to leave college in 2008.
As can be seen from charts, it is evident that the destinations of both UK students, selecting after leaving college, was similar. Further study was highest, then part-time work and unemployment, while voluntary work was smallest.
First of all, further study was the highest destination of both UK graduate and postgraduate students, which was reported to be 29.665 and 2.725 respectively in 2008. The number of both UK students who worked part-time job witnessed the second rank, standing at 17.735 of graduates and 2.535 of postgraduates.
Thirdly, unemployment of UK graduates and postgraduates were the same as rank in destination in this examined time. The former stood at 16.235 , the latter had the same situation at 1.625. Last but not least, voluntary work which was the smallest number of both students after leaving college, was recorded to be 3.500 and 345 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | thuylinholic | 73 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade s coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 89
- The charts blow show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2008. The number of both UK students who worked part-time job witnessed the secon...
^^
Line 13, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xamined time. The former stood at 16.235 , the latter had the same situation at 1....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, then, third, thirdly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9983247543 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8412466228 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366790384356 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163924767612 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183443033898 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268373741465 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212982609553 0.0819641961636 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.