Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
People have different views about enhancing community health by constructing more infrastructure relating to sports. While some argue that the benefits of this solution are not as enormous as others, I take the view that if being implemented reasonably, this idea will be the most effective way.
One the one hand, there are myriad reasons why people believe that the merits of constructing more sports facilities are negligible. They suppose that applying this idea cost too much money to afford, especially for developing country which has high poverty rates. In lieu of building a stadium, therefore, the State Budget should be spent on subsidizing for the poor and upgrading hospital amenities, which could improve inhabitant health through accessing the top-notch therapy.
On the other hand, there are a plethora of benefits from this trend. Whether building more sports infrastructure is helpful or not is a redundant question. First, since sedentary lifestyle in cosmopolitan becomes widely popular, only this idea could deal with this issue. Indeed, this lifestyle is associated with a lot of dangerous diseases such as diabetes, which triggers a thousand deaths per annum. Therefore, more sports facilities are more chances for people to work out and improve their health. Second, if investment for sports is at proportionate level, it will not necessitate a waste of money as we think. In reality, the authority could offer facilities based on the available one to reduce the cost, such as equipping the parks with simple sporty equipment.
All in all, although it might appear challenging for some developing countries, I personally still advocate for this trend when implementing reasonably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Please briefly state your scientific and professional interests and objectives, as well as your career goals. Include a description of your past accomplishments that are not evident from the examination of other documents submitted. Report your results, i 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39552238806 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87230071256 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630597014925 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2093072279 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158673607893 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560436902837 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437052052157 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991857205539 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590399224591 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.