Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that it is better to have a vast knowledge of many academic subjects rather than being an expert in one specific subject. I personally agree with the latter idea and my points of view are as follows.
As a first point, nowadays, people are struggling to find a job and vacancies are mostly devoted to experts in the field. Therefore you have to be expert to find a suitable career. For example, I remember that there was an announcement recruiting an expert in theoretical physics, with an extreme salary, who is able to work in machine learning.
Secondly, studying in a certain subject can improve the field of study properly. Indeed, you will be able to present some ideas and solve some open problems in that field, while a shallow learning can not help. This is why scientists can publish a paper in their graduate program which is more specialized, while an undergraduate student usually can not release a publication.
Finally, on the other hand, having a broad knowledge of many academic subjects does not seem to be useful. For instance, I had a classmate who studied both Physics and Mathematics in our undergraduate program. Albeit, he was successful in both subjects, however, he did not work out a significant problem in each field.
To sum up and summarize my point of view, I agree that today people should be specialized in a certain subject deeply because they can easily find a profession and solve a problem in their field of study.
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO 45 73
- TPO 47 60
- TPO 45 3
- TPO 45: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my points of view are as follows. As a first point, nowadays, people are s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...mostly devoted to experts in the field. Therefore you have to be expert to find a suitabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... able to work in machine learning. Secondly, studying in a certain subject ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly can not release a publication. Finally, on the other hand, having a bro...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significant problem in each field. To sum up and summarize my point of view...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 255.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85098039216 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76598774344 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.262334204 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.083333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.45110844103 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194023573286 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754090613932 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106777442874 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12210994399 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115970603936 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.