Harton town
The maps illustrate both an old Horton in 2008 as well as a new town, that has been completely changed by few years until 2016.
Overall, significant changes were occurred with all parts of the horton. While the major settings in the west-north territory were repurposed and overhauled, both north-east and south-east area has seen demolishing and sites, that were changed in scales.
Firstly, woodland and lake were reduced in size, where forest now is only in the north-east part and loch has been decreased to a pond by the year 2016. Meanwhile industrial complex has only increased, by this reason, it took a large part in the sought-east of the area, even demolishing residential area at all.
Secondly, not only expansion of settings was done, but also repurposing of the big district in the north-west of horton. Evidently, as we can see, the overhaul was took not as big role as the rearrangement. Reconstruction was done to arts centre, which has become a multi-screen cinema, as well as residential area has changed to a shopping centre by the year 2016 in horton. clearly, derelict warehouses were overhauled to a car park in the north, which is near the offices and university, these were repurposed from an old town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | koinoyokan | 36 | view |
- household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- the graph shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 84
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of outokumpu companies in euros between january 2006 and december 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s illustrate both an old Horton in 2008 as well as a new town, that has been completely ch...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...letely changed by few years until 2016. Overall, significant changes were occurr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and sites, that were changed in scales. Firstly, woodland and lake were reduced ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...n decreased to a pond by the year 2016. Meanwhile industrial complex has only increased, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...dently, as we can see, the overhaul was took not as big role as the rearrangement. R...
^^^^
Line 19, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clearly
...ping centre by the year 2016 in horton. clearly, derelict warehouses were overhauled to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01435406699 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90150263143 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583732057416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2577808591 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0468536961876 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214020218846 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401150440607 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367350830445 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417504736703 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.