Harton town
The maps illustrate both an old Horton in 2008 as well as a new town, that has been completely changed by few years until 2016.
Overall, significant changes were occurred with all parts of the horton. While the major settings in the west-north territory were repurposed and overhauled, both north-east and south-east area has seen demolishing and sites, that were changed in scales.
Firstly, woodland and lake were reduced in size, where forest now is only in the north-east part and loch has been decreased to a pond by the year 2016. Meanwhile industrial complex has only increased, by this reason, it took a large part in the sought-east of the area, even demolishing residential area at all.
Secondly, not only expansion of settings was done, but also repurposing of the big district in the north-west of horton. Evidently, as we can see, the overhaul was took not as big role as the rearrangement. Reconstruction was done to arts centre, which has become a multi-screen cinema, as well as residential area has changed to a shopping centre by the year 2016 in horton. clearly, derelict warehouses were overhauled to a car park in the north, which is near the offices and university, these were repurposed from an old town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | koinoyokan | 36 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts in 2012 with the predictions for 2030 67
- The maps below show the changes experienced by the town of Horton at the beginning of the 21st Century 74
- The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- the street plans below show a residential area with a park and playground in 2016 and the proposed changes for 2025 to make it safer for families and children 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s illustrate both an old Horton in 2008 as well as a new town, that has been completely ch...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...letely changed by few years until 2016. Overall, significant changes were occurr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and sites, that were changed in scales. Firstly, woodland and lake were reduced ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...n decreased to a pond by the year 2016. Meanwhile industrial complex has only increased, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...dently, as we can see, the overhaul was took not as big role as the rearrangement. R...
^^^^
Line 19, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clearly
...ping centre by the year 2016 in horton. clearly, derelict warehouses were overhauled to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01435406699 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90150263143 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583732057416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2577808591 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0468536961876 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214020218846 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401150440607 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367350830445 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417504736703 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.