The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most improtant for the nation’s government to take to protect the enviornment.
1: Fund the research to develop environmentally friendly energy sources such as solar and wind energy.
2: Preserve the natural places like forests and protect the animals that live there.
3: Enforce to prevent the pollution of air and water by large companies.
Nowadays, with the rapid development of technology and economy, more and more factories are built. So there is more pollution to the environment. Thus, environmental protection has bacome one of the most important thing to government. To improve the quality of environment, the government takes three actions, one is to develope more friendly energy, one is preserve the natural places and the last is force those big companies to prevent pollution to water and air. People may take different standpoints. From my perspective, I believe developing friendly energy is the most efficient way. My reasons and examples are given below.
To begin with, present energies had negative effects to the earth. Because many of those energies have side-effects such as releasing carbon dioxide and PM25, causing damage to the earth atmosphere. Those are all serious troubles to human since they can destroy our health can damage the environment. Take Beijing as an example. Beijing used to have very clean and sunny sky, but with the growth of the population, it became more and more polluted. With the increasing of population, there are more cars on the roads, so more carbon dioxide had been released, which polluted the clear sky. Besides, more trees are being cut because the expansion of the city. With less trees, those carbon dioxide released by cars became unresisted, which caused more damage to the environment. So from this example we can see that developing friendly energy is crucial to human today.
What is more, energies in modern world are not endless. With the rapid development of population and economy, those energies are required more. If people use up all the energy, they will have nothing to use. So they will begin to exploit the earth more quickly, and the earth will eventually be destroyed because of the endless explore of human. On the contrary, if people develope some friendly energies such as solar and wind energy, it will not only benefit the enviroment but also human themselves. Plus, those energies are green energies which won’t cause damage to the environment because they come from nature. Those green energies will be endless since the sun and wind will always exist. People can collect them by building constructions whenever those energies are needed. So its better to find a friendly energy.
Admittedly, force those big companies to prevent water and air sounds good but actually it is those small companies that will make pollution. So this idea can not solve the problem thoroughly. And the preserving natural places thing also sounds neat. However, there are still many poachers that will kill animals and destroy the forest.
To sum up, developing friendly energy is the most beneficial and efficient way. It can not only benefit the environment but also protect the earth.
- The government can take a variety of actions to help protect the environment. Which one of the following do you think is the most improtant for the nation’s government to take to protect the enviornment.1: Fund the research to develop environmentally fr 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should be required to take basic science courses even if it is not the field of their study. 73
- One can learn a lot about the person from the type of friends the person has 76
- Movies are worth watching only when they teach something about real life 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...because the expansion of the city. With less trees, those carbon dioxide released by...
^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
... thoroughly. And the preserving natural places thing also sounds neat. However, there ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2364.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10583153348 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59757454427 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477321814255 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5337963194 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2580645161 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.935483871 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16129032258 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134635729096 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041446498413 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522040105938 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925957206624 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772236903024 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.