Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Food is important for human life in many ways because we cannot survive without it. For me, If I had to make choices where I eat, I would definitely prefer eating meals at my home. I feel this way for the two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, I really enjoy cooking by myself because it allows me to intricate with other people with more ease. What is more, I am allergic to certain ingredients, so cooking by myself gives me the opportunity to experience any kinds of food without any allergies. Since in a restaurant, there are only certain types of meals in their menus. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by own experience. During every weekend, I really love cooking for my family and talking about our week news with each other because that is the only time we can sit together. Furthermore, I like to learn about other countries’ meal recipes such as Russian, American, Mexico, Thai. Whenever I have a chance to meet foreign people, I would love to ask their favourite food and how they cook it. It does not only give me a chance to be close to them but also I can learn from their culture through this experience.
On top of this, cooking at home is cheaper and the best way to stay healthy. In other words, the only things you have to pay are the dishes and its ingredients which are definitely not as costly as eating in restaurants. Since you have to pay extra costs such as chip and service, so it will a great way to save your money. Drawing my own experience, Four years ago, I loved eating a lot of high-calorie fast food and I even got an eating disorder due to it. However, my mother suggested me to do my own food at home and that was completely changed my perspective toward life as well. I have become more confident with myself and always advise people about healthy food. I firmly believe that modern parents should pay attention to their children’s meals because it is a vital thing for their lives. I usually recognise that many modern kids are addicted to eating a lot, so it is really important to educate them about cooking at home and advocate to avoid restaurants and fast food.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that cooking at home is far beneficial than eating in restaurants. This is because it allows you to enjoy it and learn from other cooking cultures and this is because it is the best way to stay healthy and save money.
- tpo27 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The administrators of a university are revising their budget and have decided to change their funding priorities As a result the university will now spend more money on sports and athletic facilities than they do on the campus libraries Do you think this 89
- tpo22 83
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 806, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...se it is a vital thing for their lives. I usually recognise that many modern kids...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, such as, talking about, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45898004435 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53536982644 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492239467849 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8965627345 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7619047619 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205733042034 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620178129499 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653217782567 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136705346613 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618894357304 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.