units of electricity by fuel source in Australia and France
the pie charts illustrate the proportion of five different sources of fuel for Australian and French in 1980 and 2000.
overall, the total electricity production in the two countries almost doubled during the period shown and the big discrepancies were seen in the sources used.
coal was used as the main fuel source in Australia in 1980 and almost tripled in 20 years later around 130 units. in the meantime, nuclear power took the same position in france, from 15 units in 1980 to 126 in 2000.
hydro power accounted for nearly 20% in both two years in Australia, while the percentage of using that type of source in France dropped from 5 to 2 units in 2000. by contrast, about 20 to 25 units of electricity by oil fuel was spent in France in corresponding with a considerable fall in Australia to just 2 units in 2000. natural fuel played a significant role in 1980 and became nearly obsoleted in the 20 following years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- should education and healthcare be free of charge and funded by the government or should be the responsibility of the individuals to pay for the services. discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- the unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. what are those problems? in order to reduce the problem, should we discourage people to use car? 61
- some people think that strict punishment for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others,however, believe that other measures could be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- spending on art 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the pie charts illustrate the proportion of...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...stralian and French in 1980 and 2000. overall, the total electricity production in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coal
...ancies were seen in the sources used. coal was used as the main fuel source in Aus...
^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...led in 20 years later around 130 units. in the meantime, nuclear power took the sa...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hydro
...from 15 units in 1980 to 126 in 2000. hydro power accounted for nearly 20% in both ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...ance dropped from 5 to 2 units in 2000. by contrast, about 20 to 25 units of elect...
^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Natural
...l in Australia to just 2 units in 2000. natural fuel played a significant role in 1980 ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64242424242 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66512352045 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2608578127 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41377360491 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169257719157 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108196370466 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209451442318 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11729774896 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.