There has been a remarkable increase in the nuber of people who believe that competitve sports should be added to school syllabus, while another section of society thinks that this might have detrimental effects on children. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. In my opininon, competitive sports, such as football or basketball should include as a subject because these sports have positive aspects on physical and mental health.
Admittedly, after decades of speculation child psychologists now have fairly accurate information concerning functional effects of competive sports, such as more ambitition and better physical abilities. The primary benefit of competitive sports on pupils is that they try to work hard in order to cope with complex issues. According to a report published by the New York Times, students who play basketball are more successful than other peers thanks to this sport. Secondly, they can easily keep their physical conditions thanks to the sport lessons, which is in school syllabus, due to spend energy. Hence, competive sports ought to be added to schools’ programmes as a subject.
Despite these arguments there are a variety of possible negative effects of competitive sports and competion in schools, such as time waste and fewer productivity. The main disadvantage of the competition on pupils is that they cannot be successful in their lessons owing to lack of time because they have not enough time in order to spend science courses, such as chemistry or maths. A good illustration of this is that if football players, who play in amateur league, did not spend their time on football, they would be more successful in their school times. Moreover, students’ productivity and creavitiy might decrease owing to these sports lessons because other lessons are more useful than sport. Thus, competition and competitve sports might be perilous on children, therefore, not only teachers but also parents should be prudent concerning children lessons.
In conclusion, even though there are different views concerning competitive sports courses at schools, my personal view is that these sports must be added to lesson plans. However, the decision as to whether competitive sports should be added to syllabus must be taken in the context of the entire ministry of education.
- Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress and equally important for a country. 78
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... to lesson plans. However, the decision as to whether competitive sports should be added to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36461126005 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82657653215 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530831099196 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2453586006 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.4 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282507258153 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982144235408 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640538005705 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183720561319 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599194898067 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.