The two pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of eight various industry areas which give their participation in the economy of Turkey which was in sixteen years during 2000 and 2010.
In overall, more than a half sectors constituted a major for contributing since least amount was given by remained sectors. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the contributions of all fields over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that husbandry was most popular in Turkey to give in economy in both the years which accounted at just over below a quarter and 14% followed by Leisure and hospitality (17% to 14%). In addition to this, an amount of healthcare and education for participating in Turkey’s economy remained constant at 17% in all the given periods. After this, in 2000, regime gave 12% to Turkey’s economy whilst a steady decline of 3% observed at the end of the year.
The charts further prove that contribution from construction accounted for 3% of the economy of Turkey during 2000 and an experienced a little more than a three folds rise in one to ten between 2010. Likewise, the percentage of manufacturing and trade, utilities as well as transportation were found 12%,8% and 5% respectively from 2000 to 2010. Lastly, given by finance, business and other sectors in the economy of Turkey shown a 2% increased in the last year.
- The two pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002. 73
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 61
- Nowadays cities have become overcrowded. Given reason and its solutions. 73
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emission in different countries during three different years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, lastly, likewise, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97899159664 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97099232985 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546218487395 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0345529774 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229365508764 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917061896177 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435397309243 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135534330934 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046976049252 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.