A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Any person who knowingly commits a crime has done a grave mistake in his life, and has also affected harmony and security of a society. He has violated his duty towards society, and so it may sound plausible to strip him off all rights that he is granted by the state- even the right to benefit from his own labor. But, doing so in turn may bring about more destructive consequences in a society due to which I strongly oppose such response.
Firstly, those who commit crime at certain times of their lives may have done so because it was only option in their playbook to tackle certain problem. In low-income countries, for instance, many people involve themselves in crimes such as robbery because they don't have any other means to feed mouths of their family. In addition, those who act wrongly at certain times of life don’t imply that they are always an ill-willed person. There are many examples when certain person, who committed grave crimes at certain times of their life, becomes a social inspiration later. Christina Randell, for example, served a five-year sentence after she was accused of robbery, but after she finished her term she started a You Tube channel, where she talked about pains of being incarcerated, and how one can tackle it. Now, she has more than 400 thousand subscribers in her channel and is affecting the lives of people positively. Does it, in any way, seem plausible to strip her right to earn her living through her work because she committed a robbery out of necessity five years ago? Obviously not.
Similarly, abandoning the rights of criminals might make them feel more isolated, and that feeling of isolation might direct them towards more violent crime. In USA, for instance, the rate of recidivism is rising up at very rapid pace these days, as people feel very isolated after they return from jail. If only a feeling of isolation from society can induce such a level of recidivism, what would stripping the rights that are needed for their survival would do? It would, obviously, create more dire situation in the society as these criminals would turn more violent.
In the same way, civil rights are in-born things attributed to a man; they are needed for the survival in society. Even if someone does a crime knowingly (breaking the social contract), he/she deserves the right to survive; everyone in the society deserves to get a chance. One should always consider human survival as a basic element of society. The crime is done; we can never get a robbed money back; or a murdered body alive again. The only thing that we can retrieve is a sense of goodness in a perpetrator; remove all the sense of ill-will inside him/her. So, we should instead take that chance.
Finally, even if a person who commits crime knowingly, he may have done it out of necessity, he may want to be good and peaceful part of society again, so one shouldn't strip off all the basic rights and make him/her feel more isolated, rather the perpetrator should be integrated in the society, and be given chance to be a good member of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 83
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 79
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 33
- We live under the illusion that we know what we want when actually we merely what we are supposed to want 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uty towards society, and so it may sound plausible to strip him off all rights th...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... in crimes such as robbery because they dont have any other means to feed mouths of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'You'?
Suggestion: a; You
...after she finished her term she started a You Tube channel, where she talked about pa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'strip'
Suggestion: strip
... such a level of recidivism, what would stripping the rights that are needed for their su...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing that we can retrieve is a sense of goodness in a perpetrator; remove all th...
^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... peaceful part of society again, so one shouldnt strip off all the basic rights and make...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor should be integrated in the society, and be given chance to be a good member ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75140186916 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45370516853 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506542056075 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9694937949 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.047619048 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4761904762 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296146765681 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767484615942 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706031500645 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159584961491 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707995487363 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.