You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her?
There is no doubt that lots of people have friends. Nowadays, a friend is playing an important role in our daily life. As far as I am concerned, I will still be friends with him or her, and there are two reasons will suffice here to support my idea.
First, more friends mean a wider network which is good for people to do plenty of things. It is very normal that there are some differences between people. Thus, keeping friendship with others who do things that people do not like is an essential class for people to learn in their life. In this case, people are able to learn how to get along well with others and they have to tolerate these differences during their work or study. Since people have good relationship with other people, they are more likely to get some benefits from their friends. Take me for example, I have a friend named Fiona. Although I do no like the way she behaves about somethings, we still are good friend till now. After graduation, I spent an amount of time finding a job but I failed. However, Fiona was a HR of a company, and she helped me a lot to get a job of her company easily. Therefore, people can still be friends with someone who they even do not like.
Apart from that, since making friends is a long-term process, it is very hard for people to give up this valuable relationship. As we know, becoming friend is not an easy thing, since people have to know a lot about each other and spend a huge amount time with each other. It is time-consuming and labor-consuming, everyone have put their emotion to the relationships. They love each other not just because of the way of their friends do things that they like or not. Besides, people become friends, for they have the same interest and so forth. Thus, it is not worthy for people to break up with their friends even the friends have done something that they do not like.
As the two reasons I mentioned above, it is easy to draw the conclusion that people are able to keep their friendship even they have some differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | bluuee | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | bluuee | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | SERDARKOCAK | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-14 | leematt1214 | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | persepolistmm | 73 | view |
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break 1 students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to thei 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though people already realized the importance of protecting the environment, it's unlikely that there'll be any difference. 70
- In order to succeed in doing a new job the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job 70
- Some schools are now trying to focus on the education of science and technology, so they are reducing the time they spend on teaching students art and music. Do you think it's a good decision for schools to do this? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: nowadays people are more willing to rely on themselves and family help and less willing to rely on the government when they meet problems. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45308310992 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42411439492 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479892761394 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0041932648 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.05 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283546791834 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099484082619 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806547640433 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174694079232 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759980619547 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.