The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions in
Vietnam in the year 2009.
The percentages of several religions in Viet Nam in the selected year 2009 is presented in the pie graph.
It is clear that non-religious people made up the largest proportion of the percentage in 2009. By contrast, Cao Dai religion was the smallest rate.
As can be seen, those who are non-religious made up the highest proportion of the total, at 81.8%. Buddhist was the most usual religion, with 7.9 %, followed by Roman Cathotic (6.6%). Hoa Hao, at 1.7% was nearly twice as common as Cao Dai (0.9%). It is noticeable that, the figure of Buddhist was sustantially higher than those of Hoa Hao and Cao Dai combined. Other creeds did not show in the chart together accounted for the remaning 1.1%.
- The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions inVietnam in the year 2009. 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 73
- Life circle of frog 78
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in theyears from 2012 to 2015. 78
- Export value of Vietnam fruits 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... smallest rate. As can be seen, those who are non-religious made up the highest propo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 579.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 122.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74590163934 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67559975097 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.680327868852 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 164.7 283.868780488 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9933582722 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.375 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163509969586 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705676686845 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807375049455 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13610018051 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842019685441 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.