Agree or disagree. one should keep old friends than making new ones
The time one spends with other people is one the most crucial periods in life; as communicating leads one to learn lots of diverse experiences and shape the ensuing life; hence, one of the highly controversial issues among many individuals is to stay with older friends vs. making new friends. As far as I am concerned, in a state of ambivalence, I might lean to be with older friends. Ostensibly, some people believe that we should find new friends, however, many reasons can declare the higher beneficiary of keeping older friends. I will interpret my response in the following essay.
First, strong relationships with others are an advantage for individuals because strong bonds include valuable interactions. Doubtlessly, such interactions help to broaden the mind and learn divergent beliefs. Consequently, this will enrich one’s personality. To build strong bonds one needs to learn many aspects of another person; aspects such as the behavior, family relationships, favorites, etc. which cannot be learned in a brief time. Granted all this little information contributes to the strength of a relation, but short relation cannot provide them. As an illustrative example, some years ago, during my high school time at the Beheshti high school in Iran, there was a girl, called Sara, Sara had an allergy to mango. Sara’s new friend held a party for her birthday, serving a mango cake, not knowing about the possible-allergic reaction. In the beginning, everyone thought this would be a fantastic party but this was not true. Unfortunately, Sara had to go to the hospital upon eating the cake, and it was her worst birthday. As one can see, to make strong relations, one needs much information about friends and information obtainment associated with the time.
Second, sharing a decent amount of memories with a person will help the friendship-bond, significantly. Evidently, the amount of time two people spend with each other related to their memories’ amount, and without such kind of memories, it would be hard to find a topic to speak and continue the conversation. My personal experiences are the foundation of my point. Two persons’ amount of spent time directly influences their amount of shared memories that are imperative for friendship reinforcing and therefore enhancing the courage to share adventures.
Also, it is not presumptuous to judge another’s reliability according to the shared social activities. No man can ever truly understand other’s mind-set, but a man can is more reliable after a certain period. Two people who appear comfortably talking may have spent the majority of their time together. There are times when a friend is more reliable than the family. Surely, it must be wiser to respect old relations than to deny that anyone needs a reliable person to endure hardship.
I am of the conviction that anyone needs strong relationships, people who share a decent amount of memories with, a reliable person, accordingly one of two friends for the whole life. This is a personal suggestion and the effect benefits, gaining new experiences, finding the courage to experience new ideas and endure sad times. Regarding the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that a longer relationship, with an older friend, is a better choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...nd other's mind-set, but a man can is more reliable after a certain period. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2768.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08911675603 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535984848485 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 852.3 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3887180678 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201814585567 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509657417938 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708414313914 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111224820921 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078285836282 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.