Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that government should invest more budget in railways infrastructures rather than road sytems. For a variety reasons, I completely agree with this view.
Firstly, the railways system development means a nation upgraded and expanded public transport provision which is beneficial for residential delivery. Using train can ease traffic flow therefore avoiding the rush hour traffic jams that cause by the various of cars, motorbikes, and other vehicles on roads. As a result, that would speed up journey times for cititzents. An integrated transport system also help saving the money which is the most important sector to choose the vehicles. Because government will subsidize the cost of fares in order to encourage commuters to have access to public transport through cheap season tickets that people could save the fee of park and ride.
Secondly, the expending of railway cause good effect on protecting environment. Cutting down emissions from vehicles on roads will result in reducing air pollution. For example, a train would burn of fossil fuels less than the number of cars in terms of transmission capacity. On the other hand, the global warming partly stems from the increase in automobile exhaust emissions which is also cause the green house effection. The investment in transport infrastructure would reduce the carbon footprint from the number of vehicles on roads.
In conclusion, I totally agree with the decision of government to allocate financial cost on railways base rather ran roads infrastructure because the advantage of traveling and category by train is no doubt to debate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education Agree or disagree 89
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people believe that government should invest more budget in ...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...agree with this view. Firstly, the railways system development means a nation upgra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...n integrated transport system also help saving the money which is the most important s...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'caused'.
Suggestion: caused
...omobile exhaust emissions which is also cause the green house effection. The investme...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41960784314 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78862962932 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619607843137 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8656647509 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.307692308 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163494129358 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528752606421 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678576229035 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117186790117 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777600255936 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.