The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the proportion of water used for the various purposes in sex regions in the world.
Overall, agricultural use accounted for the largest proportions of the total in South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia, but the highest percentage of all purposes in North America and Europe was Industrial use.
Agricultural use, which was the highest proportions, represented 71%, 84%, 88%, 81% in South America, Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia respectively. While this figure for North America (39%) and Europe (32%) gained the second percentage of total.
Industrial use gained the largest percentage of the total with 48% in North America and 53% in Europe. Whereas this figure was the lowest proportion for South America (10%), Africa (7%) and Central Asia (5%), but represented the second of total in South East Asia with 12%. Domestic use in six regions accounted for small percentage with 13%,19%,15%,9%,7%,7% in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia respectively.
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education Agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Asia, but the highest percentage of all purposes in North America and Europe was...
^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely. While this figure for North America 39% and Europe 32% gained the second per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87756912 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436363636364 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8600355118 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118425780511 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847878913095 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686145915027 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116544295296 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727883368735 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.