A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Currently, people can be evaluated based on how rich they are or their social status. Recently, honesty, kindness, and trust those aged-behaviors is not desired traits any more. I think that values are considered more than any other attitudes. In this essay, I will discuss how valuable are those behaviours.
Firstly, Most of people own the money and have a high social status, they can achieve anything they need. whereas, they are not have a good social relationship beside they may be hated by most of their surrounding people. To be a social icon does not mean you have an easy life.For example, the famous basketball player Dennis Rodman, who played for Detroit Piston and he was an embassador in Korea, he recently accused for rubbory and barely afford living expenses.
Secondly, the old is gold. The people whom maintain their presious old manners, such as honesty, kindness, and trust, are valuable assets to keep in touch with. The old values are very important to be rose in our socitey as we can not imagine our world without that traditional values. However, we have to highlight those behaviours in our society. For instance, the effect of one value is clear in the article which published in Finland later which state that most of lost wallets has been returned back to their owners.
To conclude, judging persons according to their money or social status is a common trait. Whereas, traditional values such as honesty, trust, and kindness not have the same importance as before. I believe that the aged-manners are more valuable than rich or social status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | BASEM MOHAMED | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | MO86 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Ahmed karem Mahmoud Ahmed | 89 | view |
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...ble are those behaviours. Firstly, Most of people own the money and have a high social st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...s, they can achieve anything they need. whereas, they are not have a good social relati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s, they can achieve anything they need. whereas, they are not have a good social relati...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ything they need. whereas, they are not have a good social relationship beside they ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...con does not mean you have an easy life.For example, the famous basketball player D...
^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...y accused for rubbory and barely afford living expenses. Secondly, the old is gold...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bory and barely afford living expenses. Secondly, the old is gold. The people wh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returned'.
Suggestion: returned
...tate that most of lost wallets has been returned back to their owners. To conclude, judg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97368421053 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53742689508 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3580071974 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171017584374 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601786887312 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426385920748 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111871848221 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469081925812 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.