The given lie graph compares the scale of various materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010. Overall, paper and cardboard were recycled at highest proportion among the four in given 28 years period.
It is evident that paper and cardboard recycling were maximum from beginning to the ending of period. Initially, in 1982 60% of it was reused but this number surge to 80% by the year 1992. Unfortunately, paper and cardboard recycling followed the negative trend up to 2010 and dropped its recycling scale. While, glass containers manufactured by half initially after 6 years the percentage plunged by 10%. Fortunately, in the next 22 years the glass recycling percentage rocketed to 60%.
Interestingly, aluminum cans recycling rate sharply increased in through out period. In 1994 the aluminium recycling production was quite negligible whereas by 2010 the production uplifted to 45%. Whilst, plastic recycling was almost steady throughout the period and lies below 10% merely.It seems clear that plastic cannot be rescued as much as the paper and cardboard do.
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To wh 11
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 56
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by the local farmers. Would the advantages of 56
- in some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 61
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ending of period. Initially, in 1982 60% of it was reused but this number surge t...
^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ans recycling rate sharply increased in through out period. In 1994 the aluminium recyclin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng rate sharply increased in through out period. In 1994 the aluminium recycling ...
^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ut the period and lies below 10% merely.It seems clear that plastic cannot be res...
^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies below 10% merely.It seems clear that plastic cannot be rescued as much as the...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s much as the paper and cardboard do.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30409356725 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77271930919 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9786450763 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265146657165 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107725967699 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101417349213 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200474029113 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116407672966 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.