Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
it is commonly witnessed that majority of things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. I strongly consider this as positive development with number of advantages which I will enunciate in this passage.
The first and foremost reason for considering positive development is related to fatigue and quality level. people who were working manually were indulged in household work for hours to accomplish task whereas now they have surplus time as work became easy to complete with help of modern technology like vacuum cleaners, ovens and so on. For instance, traditional cooking takes two to three hours to grill chicken whereas with the help of oven or griller it can be done in minutes by setting desired temperature for cooking.
The second worth mentioning advantage is related to employment for skilled workers and it motivated people to upgrade their skills accordingly. For example, washing clothes by traditional method consumes lot of time for servants but with the help of washing machine they can finish their task in less time compared to traditional method and can opt for more business which helps them to generate more revenue. Moreover, it is advantageous in terms of quality work because it minimises human errors and makes task more productive and efficient approximately nintey percentage which is considered good enough.
To conclude, i strongly favours this trend because it is advantageous as it reduce fatigue and makes work efficient with quality. In addition to this machines made life easy for humans with the help of artificial intelligence.
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problem as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is commonly witnessed that majority of ...
^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...s related to fatigue and quality level. people who were working manually were indulged...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'i' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'favour'
Suggestion: favour
...good enough. To conclude, i strongly favours this trend because it is advantageous a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
... trend because it is advantageous as it reduce fatigue and makes work efficient with q...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... efficient with quality. In addition to this machines made life easy for humans with...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7576626689 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4728372678 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21766141814 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104884126088 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159994965874 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179281042646 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19985871927 0.056905535591 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.