Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion.
Others think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is important to consider how the increased congestion on roads should be reduced. While some people believe to mitigate this issue the authorities should invest in the construction of more and multiple lane roads, I, along with many others opine that building of train and subway lines is a more effective way to reduce traffic.
On the one hand, constructing additional pathways and widening of the existing ones is supported by some because of multiple reasons. Firstly, with the availability of alternative paths, the travellers can deviate their direction towards the less congested ways and thus reducing the traffic on the main roads. Secondly, by increasing the number of lanes, the slow and fast-moving vehicles can have a different lane for their smooth movement. To exemplify, after the development of NH-8 six-lane Noida-Gurgaon Highway the daily ongoing traffic has been reduced to 30%. However, this solution is least effective as gradually it can increase the number of cars, bikes and buses on the roads.
On the flip side, some people assert that building of train and subway lines is more beneficial in mitigating the problem of traffic and I fully agree with this view. This is because metro lines, underground pathways and local train lines are the fastest and convenient services as they not only can cover the longer distances in a short span of time but also accommodate a larger number of passengers in comparison to cars and buses. Also, if commuters avail these services on a daily basis, then there will be a significant reduction of vehicles on the roads. For instance, with the introduction of subway metro lines in New Delhi, 60% of road congestion has been reduced in the last 2 years.
In conclusion, although wider and multiple roads can reduce the traffic to some extent, in my opinion, to remedy this issue train and subway lines are quintessential as these are fast and can occupy a large number of passengers leading to less road congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | nganle0912 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 87 | view |
| 2017-11-21 | erhj_2008 | 69 | view |
- Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 67
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- modern technology allow machine to perform the hard work instead of human? does this have positive or negative effect on people give your opinion with example 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.Give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 200, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ential as these are fast and can occupy a large number of passengers leading to less road congest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04833836858 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73933341756 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540785498489 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5033237422 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309324859868 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10527457546 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110473239376 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210774384301 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856395894408 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.