Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions steer the future choice of students. The controversial surrounding is whether the field of study in the educational system should encourage students to being prepared for profitable works in the future. As far as I am concerned, it is neither necessary nor fruitful to encourage students to go for lucrative jobs in the future because it is completely problematic in some aspects.
The first problem with motivating students toward their future position is that it can prevent them to enjoy what they study in the current time. Overemphasizing the future makes students ignore what they can fascinate during childhood and youth. Although, the content of courses is so important to improve the mental talent and skills of students to form their following experiences, thinking and planning for their future job should not hurt the students' connection to the present days.
Moreover, we should not lose sight of the fact that no one knows what the future holds. Who can certainly predict which courses can be fruitful to gain more money in the future? It is also notable that there are numerous profitable novel careers that there was not any knowledge about them in the past what if to transfer the associated courses to the precedent students. So lot of successful job-owners today, were definitely not educated to establish their present business. The online taxi services or online shopping services are the cases in point. Hence, projecting the future successful jobs and preparing students for the works is neither necessary nor possible.
In addition, anything that is corresponded to human interests would absolutely be profitable in the future, too. Encouraging students to study the lessons that are far from their enthusiasm, even if they are so probable to lead to lucrative jobs, is neither reliable nor beneficial for both individuals and society. Because, the fewer students are keen on the educational program, the less academic achievements they would gain, consequently, they would be disappointed in their skills and talents. Hence in the future, it is less probable that they follow the career associated with their studied programs. Therefore, they cannot earn significant money in that field, too.
In conclusion, encouraging student to follow the educational programs leading to remarkable profit in the future is not acceptable as a valid way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | z.salahshoor | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | kook | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | ko_tik | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | dvtien95 | 50 | view |
- Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: it is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.Write a 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 79
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, financial well-beings. Others believe that society needs not make extraordinary effort, especially at a great cost in money 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Educational institutions steer the futur...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpletely problematic in some aspects. The first problem with motivating studen...
^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...or their future job should not hurt the students connection to the present days. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents connection to the present days. Moreover, we should not lose sight ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks is neither necessary nor possible. In addition, anything that is correspond...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...sappointed in their skills and talents. Hence in the future, it is less probable that...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significant money in that field, too. In conclusion, encouraging student to fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30446194226 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87637937778 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514435695538 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5845155149 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.277777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208708228538 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677250363376 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503608449926 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124154676063 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456467666857 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.