the graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graphs provide data of computer ownership as pecentage of population from 2002 to 2010 and by various level of education in the years 2002 and 2010.
According to the first bar graph, it illustrates that in 2002 there were apporximately 56% of people who owned computer and it rose gradually from around 56% in 2002 to well-over 60% in 2008. furthermore, it increased very slowly and reached its peak in 2010 from well-over 60% to considerably 74%.
Base on the following figure, in 2002 it indicates that there were about 13% of computer users who had no high schol diploma and this was triply less than students whose proportion was hovering 30% of computer users. Meanwhile, in 2002, the proportion of postgraduate qualifiers was the maximum, which was approximately 75%, followed by bachelor's degree
qualifiers and incomplete college students: around 70% and slightly under 60%, respectively. However, it is suggested that the in 2010 these groups maintained very similar around 85% to 95% of users as the postgraduate qulifiers still were the most users like they were 1n 2002.
Overall, there were an increasingly onward of computer owners from 2002 to 2010, while 5 different levelof students, their computer using rates altered singnificantly and increasingly in 2002 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-07 | Nuttagrit Chakane | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...d 56% in 2002 to well-over 60% in 2008. furthermore, it increased very slowly and reached i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mately 75%, followed by bachelors degree qualifiers and incomplete college studen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18483412322 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89306894784 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597156398104 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6179613493 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.285714286 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263499337289 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138435938468 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122692092543 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174242040591 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128303961445 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.