Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is no doubt that technology have a massive impact on individuals' behavior. While some people might argue that it destroys social skills, I wholeheartedly believe that technological updates can have an advantageous effect on people's communication and relationships.
On one hand,the technological upgrades can destroy relationships due to several factors. Firstly, following latest technologies requires time which can only be available at the expense of socialising time. Therefore, friends and families complain during gatherings from the overuse of mobile phones which harms socialisation, because these meetings are spectacular opportunities for them to communicate. Secondly, the facility of reaching people out these days can make them lazy because several individual prefer to chat with their friends instead of visiting them. Thus, people should spend limited time using their gadgets in order to improve their social abilities.
On the other hand hand, I strongly believe that recent chatting applications can help people communicate easily and instantly. However, this was not available until recently ; friends and family nowadays can use their cellphones to call or chat with their beloved ones who might be living in a different continent. Furthermore, social network programs allow people to see each others' pictures which strengthen their bonds and relationships. For instance, if a teenager have to stay in a foreign country for a long time, his parents can follow his journey throughout facebook or instagram. Therefore, the presence of various communication applications might enhance social relations.
To conclude, despite the drawbacks of recent innovative technology in breaking bonds between people, I definitely see that it can be used to better communicate with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Governments prohibiting the underage children for getting full-time jobs in certaincountries. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Culture and traditions change from generation to generation. Why does this happen? What can be done to change it? 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...hat technology have a massive impact on individuals behavior. While some people might argue...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ion and relationships. On one hand,the technological upgrades can destroy rela...
^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hand
...eir social abilities. On the other hand hand, I strongly believe that recent chattin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt chatting applications can help people communicate easily and instantly. Howeve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80524344569 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10254631014 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659176029963 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.466411455 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.230769231 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1274942315 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476366017848 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484328972133 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818054877108 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047408030317 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.