Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
The passage states thet paleo diet may lead to curing of many chornic illness, however, it does not provide any prove in substantiating this claim. The anectdotal eveidence that people who consume bone broth suffer from less chronic illnesses does not implies that bone broth may lead to the prevention of disease but there is nothing to conclude it is also effective in curing the disease. However, even it is assumed that prevention and cure are commensurate, anecdotal evidence is not something which should be relied upon unless it is supported by verifiable data. If the argument showed numbers and percentage of people, which show a definite relation
between eating bone brothe and not suffering from metabolic or infalmmatory diseases, only then this statement should be accepted as truth. It might be that usually those consuming bone broth are careful enough to concentrate on improvement of other aspects of their diet and life which leads to lower diseases. Also without specific correlation between data for curing of disease and bone broth consumption, this statement is not justified.
The argument also states that emulating ancient humans diet is wise as they probably knew something unknown to current knowledge. The assumption that ancient humans had some divine knowledge with respect to physiology is not justified by any data. The genereal lifetime and disease information of ancient humans is needed to justify whether their way of eating was better than the normal way.
The supporters also claim that as paleo diets are useful because they share common ingredients as our body and that our bodies have evolved to these food. However, there has not been any definite proof in support of this claim. The benefits of nutrients such as chondrotin and cartilage is not established through practical data. They do not provide verifable proofs of incidients when ingested nutrient contributed in nerve regeneration or healing of joints.
Therefore, blindly following footsteps of ancient hominids by consuming paleo diets, though may not be harmful, should not be considered as a basic step to curing diseases unless there is substantial evidence in it support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Advaidhaa Nagarajan | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Munia Ferdoushi | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | the_akhilguntur | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Throax | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village 83
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imply'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: imply
...er from less chronic illnesses does not implies that bone broth may lead to the prevent...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'imply'
Suggestion: imply
...er from less chronic illnesses does not implies that bone broth may lead to the prevent...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Between
...eople, which show a definite relation between eating bone brothe and not suffering fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and life which leads to lower diseases. Also without specific correlation between da...
^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hysiology is not justified by any data. The genereal lifetime and disease informati...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ating was better than the normal way. The supporters also claim that as paleo die...
^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ody and that our bodies have evolved to these food. However, there has not been any defini...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28653295129 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7055781942 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570200573066 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7115054793 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.785714286 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194692112406 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621564386041 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519296221097 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980837349113 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372840860747 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.