Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is recommended that governments should focus on today's immediate problems instead of trying to solve the future problems. Though it makes sense to prioritize some emergencies rather than to pay attention to the things that might take place in the future, some problems in the future will have much more severe impacts than the current ones. What holds a government responsible and accountable is its expertise to sort out the priorities and try to solve problems. I think that some anticipated problems of future are of high importance, so they should be adressed and solved as quickly as possible. Therefore, even I find the recommendation reasonable in some ways, I do not wholly agree with it.
In countries with democratic voting system, it is very likely that the elected leaders would try to commit thier promises made in the campaign, which are usually of concern to the most-to-date issues. Indeed, some immediate problems needed to be solved. For example, the education and healthcare systems are what troubles people most at the present. They affects people's wellbeing. Now matter what political partities come into power, they should always pay attention to people's education and education.
While it is highly appreciated that the elected represent the voters' voice on the current issues, the leaders and their parties should also work on some vital future problems to sustainablly develope for the future generations. For instance, it has long been disscussed what people should do in order to work with global warming, but it has not yet seen significant progress worldwide. And unfortunately, the elected Precident of the United State, Donald Trump, even denied that global warming was happening, which should be common sense. Therefore, he declined to cooperated with other top leaders from various contries to deal with climate change together.
Future problems like global warming, will have unreverible effects on human beings and the other speicies on this planet. If all countries only pay attention the issues in the eye but fail to anticipate severe global problems, it it not likely that they will adopt effetive intervention to address the terrible changes that will finally be destructive to the humankind as a whole in the future. Therefore, anticipated problems of the future that are of high importance should also be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints 52
- Some people want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other people prefer to stay with their families for a longer time. 10
- Young people enjoy life more than the older peoper do 65
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Young people enjoy life more than the older people do 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...oubles people most at the present. They affects peoples wellbeing. Now matter what poli...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...l to anticipate severe global problems, it it not likely that they will adopt effetiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21989528796 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75066620636 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547120418848 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0779194162 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.294117647 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257049465321 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858139265306 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864570383039 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147328689477 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996481826856 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.