The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012.
The line graph compares how many assaults, armed robberies and murders that happened in London from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, the number of armed robbery cases decreased significantly over the period while assaults' figure increased. The figure of murder incidents remained relatively stable. It is also noticeable that between 2003 and 2006, the most common crime committed was armed robbery and was replaced by assault in the following years.
In 2003, the number of recorded armed robberies began at just under 3,500 and rose slightly to peak at around 3,700 in 2004. The figure dropped every year to reach a low of just over 1,000 in 2008, then subsequently went up to about 1,500 until 2012.
With regard to assaults that transpired in London, it started at roughly 2,400 at the beginning of the period. Then, the number fluctuated in the following years, when the lowest figure was noted at 2,000, before increasing to reach a high of around 2,700 in 2012. Murders' number hovered between 500 to just under 1,000 throughout the period.
- The government should offer free prenatal classes for expecting parents. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2000-2012. 11
- The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 73
- In recent years, many small shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping. Is this positive or a negative statement? 61
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hovered between 500 to just under 1,000 throughout the period.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08620689655 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42417717141 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9844573079 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193480860924 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796902409027 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658490340138 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131475513586 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649845751868 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.