Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public is as annoying as smoking and should be banned, similarly.
Mobile phone has become a part of our life nowadays as smart phones are not only capable of making calls but also it ensures you to connect with entire world 24*7. Due to generation gap, some people thinks that excessive use of mobile in public is completely annoying like smoking in public. Therefore, people demand for use of telephone within public must be banned. This essay will discuss about pros and cons of using mobile phone and reason for banning the limitless use of phones within crowd.
Let's check out the reasons of banning phone use. Firstly, having gadget like phone in hand creates distance between dear ones. We mostly involves with various applications installed in it. Therefore, we forget to stay connected with our loved ones. For example, nowadays, we sit for dinner, breakfast and lunch while checking various updates. Secondly, as per survey report, numerous numbers of accidents are happening daily basis due to huge use of phone while walking or crossing road. Similarly, while driving car, drivers are either busy with call or listening music with high volume which acts like a barrier. As an example, lots of rules or pre cautions, like don't cross the road while on call or wearing headphone, have implemented in order to increase awareness to prevent accident.
In other hand, some people do such activity like talk so loudly with in public, play music video with full sound that can be the reason for disturbance of others. In short, keeping in mind others passengers comfort zone we must limit the use of phone.
In conclusion, we are responsible for our own activity. While travelling by public bus or roaming around within public place we must keep in mind about the limitations of few mobile usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | SharmisthaNaskar | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 56 | view |
- In many professional sports there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance What are the causes of the phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions 61
- Gaming is argued to have a bad influence on young children but some people think that it could have a positive effect on them as well. Which view do you agree with? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 61
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- In the future, we will have more and more leisure time as machines replace many of the tasks we do at home and at work. Discuss the benefits this will bring 89
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...itless use of phones within crowd. Lets check out the reasons of banning phone ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'We' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'involve'
Suggestion: involve
...s distance between dear ones. We mostly involves with various applications installed in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le, lots of rules or pre cautions, like dont cross the road while on call or wearing...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... zone we must limit the use of phone. In conclusion, we are responsible for our ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94897959184 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37997307363 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1965088782 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296802229978 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937716576169 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103050758592 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183887397449 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142452930448 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.