Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It goes without saying that in today's complicated world we live in, most projects should be accomplished in groups. It comes as no surprise that there are various means of communication which can significantly affect the progress of a group project. There is a substantial number of people who incline toward the idea that if classmates or co-workers communicate about a project in person rather than by e-mail, they will have more chance of success. I firmly concur with their opinion. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated upon and exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs by focusing on two outstanding reasons.

The first imperative point to be mentioned is that people can save their time by conducting a project in person. As a matter of fact, face-to-face communication has a more efficient approach because there is no delay or procrastination between discussion. Unlike e-mail or other modern means of exchanging messages, not only can in-person talk directly deliver the verbal messages but also non-verbal communications such as facial expressions and body gestures substantially affect the real notion of the messages. Perhaps one more specific and firsthand experience can shed more light on the matter. When I was an undergraduate student in polymer engineering, I had to fulfill an assignment about the biodegradable plastics in a group. Because both of my classmates had a vacation back then, we had to conduct the project with e-mail. Consequently, it took an inordinate amount of time to accomplish the project due to the long delays. Moreover, there were copious errors and misunderstanding which led to negative ramifications. Had our project carried out in person, we would have had more chance of fulfilling a more prosperous project.

Another reason which deserves some words here is that face-to-face discussion can stimulate new ideas. No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that those who exchange copious ideas in a real situation, increase the chance of bringing up innovative ideas. Take students who should conduct a project with their teachers. If they have to send a variety of e-mails, they miss the chance of arousing new opinions. They cannot continuously cultivate their minds and will deprive of making instant notions in their minds.

All in all, contemplating all the aforementioned remarks, one could conclude that in-person communication not only can prominently boost the efficiency and prosperity of a project by evoking new ideas and brainstorming but also accelerate the pace of the progress of it.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 farhadk 71 view
2020-01-02 mobinzaarreh 73 view
2020-01-02 saeide 90 view
2020-01-01 amir_rf 76 view
2019-12-20 nusybah 60 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, such as, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26213592233 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12235466318 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8247085342 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20527113243 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600830704465 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461530185313 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122107415095 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491350703271 0.0645574589148 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.