Question :Lectures were used as a main method of teaching for the greater number of students in the past. With the existing technology, there is no longer any justification for that method.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
With the advent of technology, there seems to be a shift in the method of teaching from the traditional classroom teacher to technologically inclined form of learning. While technological advances may have greatly improve learning, I do not agree that the conventional type of lecturing is no longer needed.
Firstly, with the aid of a class teacher, students level of assimilation is increased. In other words, face -to- face teaching gives the learners an avenue to understand what was taught by interacting with the lecturer, getting clarifications on difficult topics and even asking questions at the end of each lecture. For example, many first class graduates are those who engaged their lecturer in class for more detailed explanations, as a result, their level of understanding is enhanced.
Secondly, the role of a classroom tutor is vital in practical teachings. Students are guided by their teachers to have a hands-on experience which is very imperative for overall performance of the pupils. Medical students are good example. They are often time led by their teachers to have a first hand experience by putting them true on how to use the microscope to visualise organs of the body.
Admittedly, advancement in technology may have improved learning method by providing students with a lot of information online by simply surfing the internet. However, Learners will still need a classroom instructor guidance for them to have proper understanding of the topic and also during practical classes.
In conclusion, even though technological advances has tremendously enhanced method of learning by providing learners with information, I also believe that the importance of a classroom instructor should not be neglected as practically improve the learners.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make. Has this become a positive or negative development. 73
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 83
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centres while others prefer local markets. What are the advantages of each. Which shopping experience do you prefer... 73
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman, a tertiary education is not all necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. Give your opinion with relevant examples 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom the traditional classroom teacher to technologically inclined form of learnin...
^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the conventional type of lecturing is no longer needed. Firstly, with ...
^^
Line 13, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill need a classroom instructor guidance for them to have proper understanding of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45126353791 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15551965272 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3784940492 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20860648281 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701019723385 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374971375451 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107426255016 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446431444634 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.