The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phones between 2009 and 2013.
The bar graph compares the number of mobile phones sold worldwide by the five most popular manufacturers in the years 2009,2011 and 2013.
In 2009, Nokia sold close to 450 millions phones which was almost double the number of handsets sold by the second most successful manufacturers Samsung, over the following four years, however, Nokia sales figures fill significantly by approximately 200 million units. Whereas Samsung witnessed rise in the sales by a similar amount. By 2013, Samsung had become the market leader with sales reaching 450 million units .
The other three top selling mobile phones brands between 2009 and 2013 were LG , ZTE and Apple. In 2009, these companies sold around 125 million, 50 million and 25 million mobiles handsets respectively, but Apple handsets overtook the other two vendors in 2011. In 2013 purchased of Apple handsets 150 million units, while LG saw declining trend and the figure for ZTE rose slightly.
Overall, it is clear that Nokia sold the most mobile phone between 2009 and 2011 but Samsung became the most selling brand in 2013. Samsung and Apple saw the biggest rises in the sales over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Komalpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Mohamed talaat | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Qanh03 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-04 | Sukeerty | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tly by approximately 200 million units. Whereas Samsung witnessed rise in the sales by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t leader with sales reaching 450 million units . The other three top selling...
^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r with sales reaching 450 million units . The other three top selling mobile...
^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nes brands between 2009 and 2013 were LG , ZTE and Apple. In 2009, these companies...
^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these companies sold around 125 million, 50 million and 25 million mobiles hands...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies sold around 125 million, 50 million and 25 million mobiles handsets respecti...
^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 million mobiles handsets respectively, but Apple handsets overtook the other t...
^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., but Apple handsets overtook the other two vendors in 2011. In 2013 purchased o...
^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo vendors in 2011. In 2013 purchased of Apple handsets 150 million units, while...
^^
Line 9, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed of Apple handsets 150 million units, while LG saw declining trend and the fi...
^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion units, while LG saw declining trend and the figure for ZTE rose slightly. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11578947368 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4266082779 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5584576407 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259072535156 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123423284158 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090501316917 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178147337495 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407125994269 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.