The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In the first half of the twenty-first century advertising has been deemed as one of the practical procedures for soaring buying rates. Opponents of commodity promotion, however, assert that enormous sales are merely owing to the power of advertisement and do not meaningfully linked to the populace basic requirements. This contention is self-evident.
To embark upon, advertising is regarded as a method to lure individuals into developing their impulse for branding. Following this craze, the newer item of a specific brand they purchase, the more satisfied they would feel. No matter how well-operated a mobile phone is, their fervent users would dash to provide a newly released version. This approach could not be obtained, unless impressive advertisement is broadcasted repeatedly in the media. Not surprisingly, then, the figure for a relentlessly advertised commodity would increase steeply.
Another justification behind espousing the community need for excessive buying as a result of advertising is correlated with the potential of which to entice their audience who are pursuing to be distinguished distinctive. Cosmetic industry, as one the pioneer leaders in this attitude, invest huge sums of money to promote their productions. Had not been they exaggerated immensely, a myriad number of Arabic women might not be accustomed to utilize such products, as a salient exemplar. Subscribing to this notion, considerable money has been thrown away, as an adverse ramification.
In way of conclusion, increasingly broadcasted promotion methods have laid the groundworks for consumerism, in which people have been tempted to become branding followers and self-confident, by using vastly-depicted goods in media. This, admittedly, reflects the advertising strength but not necessarily the society requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | miladrezaee | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | caramen_b | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 56 | view |
| 2016-07-23 | manpreet135 | 56 | view |
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this. 89
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views an 84
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to utilizing'.
Suggestion: accustomed to utilizing
...iad number of Arabic women might not be accustomed to utilize such products, as a salient exemplar. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77777777778 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36549301141 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8339132341 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101532502051 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034382850476 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411632112378 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0632617049241 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252271980738 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.