The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
The presented bar graph compares the percentage of various groups of people who visit 4 different recreational areas in Canada, namely cinema, theatre, library and zoo. The data is calibrated in percentage.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, cinema accounted for the highest proportion of Canadian people in terms of leisure activity, whereas the figures for theatre was the least popular visited place.
Looking at the data in more details, it is evident that the cinema is by far the most popular free-time activity listed in the chart for those with English as their first language — 70% of non-migrants and 65% of English-speaking migrants. Half the migrants from non-English-speaking countries also go to see a film but interestingly, 5% more of this group prefer the library to the cinema. Roughly 40% of the other two groups say they visit the library.
Turning to rest of description, zoos are visited most by half of the English-speaking migrants compared to just over 40% of those born in Canada and approximately 35% of the migrants born where English is not widely spoken. The theatre is least popular for all concerned, with only 10% of non-English-speaking migrants attending, while double the number of native Canadians go to see a play. A quarter of those born in English-speaking countries are theatre-goers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 84
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 75
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 84
- The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... data is calibrated in percentage. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17727272727 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30219999294 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1823022959 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123884736857 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501153099695 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600883353753 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900902853699 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545697036855 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.