The graph illustrate; how, a certain country invested their money at the stock market from 2001 to 2006.
Overall, the stocks were higher throughout the period above the bonds. Similarly more bond and stocks were noticeable in the same year, as well as, the least. It is of note, that the higher the stocks, the more bonds throughout given period.
In terms of stocks, they were higher at 311 billion in 2006, as opposed to 188 bonds in the same year. The least amount put on the market to purchase bonds was 100 billion in 2001 and few stocks of 210 billion were available on the market in the same year.
Furthermore, it can be clearly seen that, from 2001 to 2006, the stocks were doubling the prices of bonds. From 2001 to 2003, the stocks were going up gradually, but from 2004 to 2006 it began to fluctuate. The prices of bonds increased rapidly from 2001 to 2003, whilst for the last 3 years, it reduced the speed, as it rose steadily. It is of note, each year the prices of bonds and the stocks were increasing.
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- The table below describes victims by age group and offence category in Venezuela, 1999. 67
- The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Some people think that companies should provide employees with exercise time during the day 91
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... throughout the period above the bonds. Similarly more bond and stocks were noticeable in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount put on the market to purchase bonds was 100 billion in 2001 and few stocks o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, similarly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47340425532 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19702744775 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9156852296 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160839115651 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755463537394 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910166112145 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133789491803 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120007851042 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.46 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.