In many places, new homes are needed, but the only place available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In different parts of the world,with the growing population, there has been a surge in demand of houses. And for that, the only area left is by the countryside. Some say to preserve that location, we should not build new homes there. In my opinion, new homes need to get build by country side for the reason that there is no other place left for this purpose. And though humans are known for damaging the environment, a meaningful step like awareness for population control can be taken to take care of this problem.
Humans have always taken things for granted. And it is because of this reason, that they are short of needful amenities. People who do not favour the possibility of new construction by countryside are well aware of the adverse effects that human beings cause. From their point of view, these outsiders have already ruined their cities and in order to preserve this peaceful area, these local people do not agree with the solution of coming up with new infrastructure in their area. Moreover, they are of the perception that the city people will cause damage to this peaceful habitat by causing air, as well as water pollution. To exemplify, younger generation in India are choosing to open their cafes in Manali, which is a hill station. This has led to increase in people visiting those places and contributing to increase in litter, ultimately causing negative impact on the surroundings.
One possible solution for taking control is to make people aware about the current situation. They should be taught about the problems caused by increase in population so that they do proper family planning. This in turn, would help them to save the available amenities for their future generation. To illustrate, Chinese people in 1950 took a measure to control their population by introducing one child policy. It took them more than 70 years to come up with a positive result. It would eventually make these people realise that they are blessed with limited facilities and therefore, they must take proper care of that, without and misuse.
To conclude, people who argue about not allowing to build new things in countryside are well aware with the consequences. But, we need to realise that there is no other option. Having said that, we must also realise that without the facilities provided to us by mother earth, we would not be able to survive. Hence, population control should be done to save our future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 67
- With the development of modern society is the loss of traditional ways of life Is it important to keep our traditional ways of life How can this be achieved 59
- Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people say that it is important to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- You had a dinner with your friend s family Write a letter to your friend and express your feelings about the dinner In your letter you should say What you enjoyed at the dinner Describe how you feel about his her family Invite your friend and his family t 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
In different parts of the world,with the growing population, there has been ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 50, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'building'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: building
...de, people who argue about not allowing to build new things in countryside are well awar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89855072464 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57234129123 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514492753623 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6278582329 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249680617309 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724557874197 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837344739318 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153591617977 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924482528944 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.