Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the ability of humpback whales to navigating by stars. The author of reading believes that there are three signs which support this hypothesis. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. Professor is of the opinion that these marks are not convincing.
First of all, the author suggests that humpback has an intelligent for using stars to navigate. This idea is challenged by the lecture. He says that other animals such as dogs have this ability to navigate by stars, but they have average or very low smart. Furthermore, he argues that navigating by stars has no connection with the clever in humpback because these are two separate things.
Secondly, the writer contends that humpback can migrate in straight lines. The article notes this skill does need some external objects or forces, so stars can use instead of objects for the whale that they can maintain their direction. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that animals when they can use this way which they have to sense external forces. He elaborates on this by mentioning that humpback whales have bio magnetite in their brains, but it no indicates a relation between this substance with navigating by stars, otherwise, the bio magnetite suggests that whales can orient themselves by magnetic field without stars.
Finally, it is stated that in the article that humpback whales have spy-hopping that is rare behavior in other animals. The explanation for the skill is that it can provide a condition for whales to see the stars and get enough information from them for navigating. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that spy-hopping is rare in other animals, but some sharks have spy-hopping that they hunt their prey in this way. Also, the professor says that humpback whales do the spy hop during the day that there are no stars at that time. As a result, this action has no function in navigating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. Problems for sending human to MArs 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 80
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement grades encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 40
- The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vacation programs Which one do you think is better for students 1 Take some college courses in advance e g some courses that are related to student s major 2 Visit some 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee signs which support this hypothesis. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98159509202 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52275764715 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1513322274 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5294117647 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0584251653517 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243045041288 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290422211553 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425856534799 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171921489124 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.