The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries (2000-2012)
The line graph illustrates the proportion of women parliament member in Germany, Italy, U.K, France and Belgium
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that all countries experienced an upward trend over the period. Therein Italy being the country was the highest and The U.K and Belgium was the lowest.
In 2000, Nearly 35% of the member parliament was female, compared to stand at just over 25% in Italy and 25% in France. From 2000 to 2004, the number of female members in all three nations increased, therein France being the country had the strongest rising and reached a peak of about 36% in 2004. Meanwhile, the quantity of female in Italy rose to about 10%, while the figures for Germany didn't change too much. Since 2004, the percentage of female parliament members in Italy và Germany went up at under 40% and around 37% in 2012, respectively. By contrast, the data of France rapidly drop to approximately 29% in 2008 before it slightly escalated at over 30%
Around 17.5% of the parliament members in Belgium were female while this number in the U.K only had about 3% in 2000. During 12 years, the figures for both were terribly increased and similar to approximately 28% in 2012
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years compared with the European average 73
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 84
- Education for young people is important in many countries However some people think that the government should spend more money on education in adult populations who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs What problems do you think youth unemployment causes for individuals and the society What measures should be taken to reduce the level of unemployment among youngsters 61
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
... parliament member in Germany, Italy, U.K, France and Belgium Looking at the gr...
^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...g the country was the highest and The U.K and Belgium was the lowest. In 2000, ...
^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...bout 10%, while the figures for Germany didnt change too much. Since 2004, the percen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
... were female while this number in the U.K only had about 3% in 2000. During 12 ye...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83173076923 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51531918875 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6966554916 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330121568823 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130511756662 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074736773049 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173686874077 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823515975545 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.