In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
In the modern society today, it is easily observed the emergence of a new tendency in which residents of metropolitan regions often opt for living by themselves or in nuclear families in lieu of multi-generational family units. In my perspective, albeit this trend has some benefits, I believe that also goes along with some negative impacts, and this essay below will outline them.
On the one hand, there are a few profits for people to earn when they live alone or in a conjugal family. Firstly, the young will have advantageous conditions to update themselves. It is easily to witness that most of the students nowadays who have dreams of continuing their education at higher levels are made to stay away from their home, that means that no longer parents around they have got to become more independent and confident in taking care of themselves and producing decisions in daily life as a result. Additionally, the difference in lifestyle between the young and the old is also a remarkable reason. The majority of mature dwellers prefer to live a slow-paced, peaceful, healthy life during the rest of their time in the countryside rather than a hectic, fast-paced one in hustle and bustle cities, whereas the youth consider freedom as one of the foremost criteria that must has in their life since they do not wish to follow the norms in life of their parents and grandparents. Therefore, living alone allows them to enjoy their life by the way they please, please imagine that, you can let your room untidy or come home late owing to hanging out with your friends without having to face constant judgment or criticism.
On the other hand, this trend also brings several drawbacks. First of all, the long-lived citizens often suffer from diseases such as heart attack or mental problems, and due to living alone, they are in the absence of the care and attention from their children and grandchildren, which is a really dangerous situation. Secondly, when children are not under the same roof with their grandparents, they potentially miss out on valuable life lessons from their grandparents. More seriously, if people choose live single or in only two-generations family groups, the link between generations will gradually fade away.
In conclusion, the shrink of household size is accompanied by both merits and demerits. Personally, I have faith in that the advantages of this tendency can not outweigh the disadvantages.
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 78
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 78
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 84
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustle cities, whereas the youth consider freedom as one of the foremost criteria ...
^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to live'
Suggestion: to live
...rents. More seriously, if people choose live single or in only two-generations famil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82580268219 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.825874641 49.4020404114 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.357142857 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125188373786 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450836517715 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442396749715 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819335263794 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517370703352 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.