In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend

Essay topics:

In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

Nowadays, many people believe that living alone or in nuclear families is more comfortable than in extended family groups. I also think that living in a small family brings more benefits than staying in a house that has 3 or 4 generations.

On the one hand, living with an extended family has some positive effects. Firstly, we can gain many worthwhile life lessons from living with our grandparents. Throughout their lives, they will be able to share valuable life experiences. During their retirement, your grandparents will have more time to take care of their children’s physical and mental health problems. Whenever you have a stressful time, you can talk to them about what you do every day. By doing these things, you will be protected from depression and mental illness. Moreover, you can learn more about the crucial traditions and customs of your country in the past.

On the other hand, staying in an extended house also has many drawbacks. First of all, when interacting with the elderly like your grandparents, they often have constant judgements or criticisms about your lifestyle, fashion and studies. Even though they believe you will benefit from those judgments, you cannot do what you want. You can follow the latest and modern trends whether you live in a nuclear family or alone. In addition, living in a small family unit has fewer needs at home than living in a large family. The bills for electricity, water or necessary equipment are cheaper. 

To sum up, staying in a large house has many benefits. As I mentioned above, the advantages of living in a nuclear family outweigh the disadvantages of living in an extended family.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-06 TLan168 78 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 78 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 61 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 61 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 73 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ater or necessary equipment are cheaper.  To sum up, staying in a large house has ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98561151079 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68561257075 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4999234067 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.625 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233474509982 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893856635261 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100800997686 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182016018078 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813207060585 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.