Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denial that a tremendous development of technology facilitates access to online information, downplaying the importance of libraries. From my perspective, I am of disagreement with this notion by virtue of its numerous outstanding merits over sources on Internet.
Those who advocate the vital necessity of online researches may base their case on the argument that technological devices serve as an abundant source of information which is readily available and accessible thanks to the Internet. Therefore, learners can easily search for whatever interests them with a click of button whenever they wish to. Compared to the traditional method of collecting information from libraries, which open only certain hours of the day, Internet users are capable of amassing data more actively and quickly. However, I personally doubt the authenticity of such online sources as a significant amount of information on the Internet has never been verified, whereby it is prejudiced, inaccurate or even misleading.
I am strongly convinced that gaining knowledge from books in libraries is significantly more advantageous as opposed to researching online. Firstly, this place affords its visitors a tranquil ambiance for learning and reading. This especially benefits students who is in need of a quiet learning atmosphere to concentrate more on their assignments since they will not be distracted by external factors such as noise or Secondly, libraries play an indispensable role in promoting reading culture as they offer a host of support services to build up such good habits. For instance, in Japan, there is an annual event in which local library staffs collaborate with teachers with a view to providing children with a chance to exchange their favorite books with a total stranger for a week. By adopting this approach, not only do students will make new friends, expand their network but this program also encourages them to read more and be confident to share more.
In conclusion, the value of libraries should not be underplayed despite multiple advancements achieved in the technological era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | buiminhanh0109 | 89 | view |
- There is a common phenomenon that products are commercially over packaged or over advertised Who do you think should be responsible for this the manufacturers or the consumers who tend to buy the products 75
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted by external factors such as noise or Secondly, libraries play an indispensabl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41515151515 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09430146577 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5368852886 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.916666667 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106557793605 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037416386847 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233733243719 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567652313205 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165178412785 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.