The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
The table describes the proportion of personal deposits of their income in different countries in the three mentioned years in 1970, 1990 and 2000.
According to the given illustration, in 1970, the percentages of personal savings were 5.6% that increased double in 1990 at 11.5 in Canada. However, there was a dramatic decline in 2000 at only 1.9%. In France, the percentages of savings decreased from 18.7% to 12.5% in 1990 that grew again at 13.6%, whereas the percentages of savings were the same in Germany both in 1970 and 1990. The figure was 13.8%. In 10 years between 1990 to 2000, the personal savings of income fall at 11.8%
As for Italy, in 1970, the personal savings were 29.5% that declined near about half and continued in 2000 at 11.4%, while the percentages of personal savings in Japan were 17.6% in 1970 that declined 12.1% in 1990 and increased at 19.6 % again in 2000.
To sum up, the percentages of personal savings in the USA decreased step by step.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | sabbir2020 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island, according to a survey of visitors. 61
- The pie charts show the level of satisfaction of university students with some of the facilities provided in the universities of the UK 49
- Q: The chart below shows the proportion of different types of vehicles that use a major bridge road in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005. 73
- Two pie charts The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island according to a survey of visitors 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...personal savings of income fall at 11.8% As for Italy, in 1970, the personal savi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81176470588 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52161410008 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.6419860588 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470420423501 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206842924349 0.103423049105 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134897806687 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300308518129 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693771606754 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.