At the first glance, the argument seems to be plausible that, first study of the Waymarsh showed that the most respondents preferred literary as their reading material but after checking out at the local libraries most of the reading materials taken out were related to history. This argument is based on some of the unfounded assumptions. For the validity of this claim, author have to answer some of the questions stated below.
First of all. does the majority of the people who were participated in the survey go to the library to get the reading material or they buy themselves instate of going to the library. Is the library only a source of reading material? If those people who took part in the survey buy almost all of their books by them selves then the writer's claim will be fallacious. Author has be able to answer this question.
Secondly, how many varieties of books are available in the local library? If the library mainly contains books more about the history and they have limited amount of books related to literature then this may be the another cause they have taken out the books related to history in greater number. Historical books might be their second choice after literacy. Due to the limited amount of book provided in literature they might not have any choice left beside taking books related to history.
Thirdly, literature is the first choice for most of the readers doesn't mean they will always read books related to literature only. Sometimes, they might like to change the topic of their study and that surveying time might held exactly at the same time when most of the readers were just changed their topic of study. Beside that, if the surveying time was around any historical date like independence day, Martin Luther King's day, then readers might love to read about the history around that time just to deviate from their normal study habit for a while. In addition, readers might intended to teach their kids about the history around the historical day by borrowing the books from the library.
In summary, there might be several other reason beyond the assumption and imagination of the author's claim that- readers have misinterpret their reading preferences. Above mentions possibilities should also be well studied before making the claim valid.
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 50
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers fo 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 389 350
No. of Characters: 1871 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.441 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.81 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.328 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.882 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.911 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d to history. This argument is based on some of the unfounded assumptions. For the validity...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ty of this claim, author have to answer some of the questions stated below. First of al...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Does
...estions stated below. First of all. does the majority of the people who were par...
^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rary only a source of reading material? If those people who took part in the surve...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
...survey buy almost all of their books by them selves then the writers claim will be fallacio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rs claim will be fallacious. Author has be able to answer this question. Secon...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he first choice for most of the readers doesnt mean they will always read books relate...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'misinterpreted'.
Suggestion: misinterpreted
...of the authors claim that- readers have misinterpret their reading preferences. Above mentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... studied before making the claim valid.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, while, in addition, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 388.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95360824742 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38414739145 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479381443299 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5728067541 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.70786347227 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148294064659 0.218282227539 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442716794613 0.0743258471296 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532841175891 0.0701772020484 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862762261676 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484408764341 0.0628817314937 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 98.500998004 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.