In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we should try to prevent?
In a great many nations, ancient languages have become obsolete, and their juveniles are particularly less eager to use them. Whether we accept this shift or attempt to preserve them provokes strong arguments, which I will consider here.
On the one hand, it can be said that this change is positive, and it will ease the way for communication. This, it is argued, would remove the language barrier in multinational societies, and help city dwellers to communicate faster and easier. Furthermore, supporters of monolingual societies may claim that this can lead to more unified communities. They point to evidence from countries such as the United Kingdom where this appears to be the case and urge other nations to follow suit. To the opponents of the idea, these benefits are convincing.
However, those who support the preservation of old languages promote the idea that they are part of their cultural heritage and should go down in history through the young generation. All nations who have passed this heritage down possess more stable communities, and this results in more flourish civilizations. Moreover, proponents of multilingual societies claim that keeping ancient languages alive may lead to more cultural diversity. This would help people from all walks of life to learn from each other and enrich their culture. This argument also appears to be quite powerful.
To conclude, while a uniform community would facilitate communication between their members, various range of cultures and their enrichment are the main advantages of passing down traditional languages to their juveniles. It would be more logical to inform the community about the consequences of both side of the issue, and then let themselves to make the decision to choose which approach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Mostafaasadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | anna5224 | 89 | view |
- ‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’How far do you share this viewpoint? 73
- It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be.Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.Include any relevant examples from your experience 61
- Nowadays people prefer to get married and have children in their 30s/30’s rather than when they are younger. Is it positive or negative development?Do you agree or disagree?To what extent do you disagree/agree? 11
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today. What are the causes of illiteracy in the modern world, and what effects does it have on the people concerned and on society as a whole? 73
- some people feel that boarding schools are an exellent option for children , while other people disagree for a number of reasons. consider both sides od this debate and reach a conclusion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment also appears to be quite powerful. To conclude, while a uniform community w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the decision to choose which approach.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28621908127 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83975853652 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614840989399 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7446789767 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160532876629 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529870221086 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327454804733 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977746194022 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245253118037 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.