Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?
Recently, the price of different products and services has been marked up including public transport. this essay will look through the reason for this phenomenon in public transport and also offers some solutions.
There are many reasons for the increment in the prices but there are two main parameters which have a high influence on the prices in public transport. Firstly, the fossil fuel price has been increased in comparison to some years ago about 40 percent which has been reported by The World Bank. Since public transportation is running on fossil fuels, it has to move in tandem to keep itself economically meaningful for the governments as the provider of this service. Secondly, drivers receive a much better salary rather than before. A higher salary for drivers is equal to a higher cost of running this service for the provider. As a result, the price marks up is inevitable.
Nevertheless, there are remedies to turn round this trend. The old fossil fuel-based buses and trains can be replaced by new and modern ones which are much more efficient and cheaper. In addition, electricity’s price is much less than the fossil fuel price, which leads to a lower overall cost for the provider. Another solution can be considered is the employment of artificial intelligence (AI) in public transport. The advanced AI can offer self-driven vehicles, which means the drivers in public transport can be substituted by a machine. As a consequence, the cost of the service will drop dramatically and thus, the ticket price can come down.
To recapitulate, The increment in the drivers’ salary and fuel price has been mentioned as predominant reasons for hiking up in public transport prices. On the other hand, Using electrical buses and trains and AI in public transport has been suggested as feasible solutions to this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | Sorena Eshkoor | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Sorena Eshkoor | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | vbgen | 64 | view |
- In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities have to make it easier, especially for such groups, to get into them.what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before Is it a positive or negative development 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n marked up including public transport. this essay will look through the reason for ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08223684211 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89802444889 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503289473684 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.597687784 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245400677096 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910309169876 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511526202167 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170263122275 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303700859349 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.