The charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The graphs illustrate the percentage of proportion Household Expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. The comparison from both of countries show that Housing, Other goods services, Food are the dominant in those countries.
In Japan, Other goods and services is the biggest percentage that people in Japan has spent Household Expenditure just under a third. Following by Food as a second biggest Household (24%) which is Food the primary part in inhabitant. Moreover, between Housing and Transport only less 1% which are Housing in 21% and Transport in 20%.
Furthermore, Malaysia has spent the biggest Household Expenditures in Housing which is almost a third (34%). In addition, Food in Malaysia also the second largest percentages which is approximately more than a quarter (27%). However, in Japan Other goods and services is the particular of the total Expenditures while in Malaysia Other goods and services is a third place that Food and Other goods and services only different 1%, it can seen that Food and Other good and services are having the same importance position in the Household of Malaysia.
In conclusion, Average Household Expenditures by major category in Japan and Malaysia have the similarities in the lowest focus on Health care. Although, Japan put a big attention in Other goods and services, Food, and Housing while Malaysia are majority in Housing, Food, Other goods and services with less concern in Transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 to 2010. 84
- The charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 73
- The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
... and services only different 1%, it can seen that Food and Other good and services a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8166932179 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.095391542 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267554723872 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137536265322 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125868543602 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198875045303 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705738046403 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.