Some people think living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the issue of whether living in big cities exerts a harmful influence on human beings' health has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that residents in big cities are more likely to undergo health problems, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that citizens in metropolitan cities, such as Tokyo and Seoul, have difficulty in avoiding some pollution, which can cause damage to their physical health, resulted from living in cities. Perhaps obvious pollution is air pollution created by a huge amount of transportation emitting CO2. In addition, there is a great deal of noise pollution in cities, which has detrimental effects on residents' mental health. This is because most of the metropolitan cities have a multitude number of people even though the size of their territory is small. Thus, many citizens have a tendency to live in flats which are difficult to prevent noise problems from rising. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that dwelling in a city does harm to citizens' health.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that living in cites merely brings with it negatives on people's health. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that residents in cities which has a huge amount of population are easy to use health care services, compared to inhabitants in the countryside. To exemplify, one recent article released by the Seoul Times illustrates that life expectancy of people in Seoul was the highest in South Korea in 2018 and the main reason for this phenomenon was turned out to be a myriad of hospitals. Furthermore, people in big cities have more chances to keep their health since there are a myriad of programs related to health, such as yoga classes and lectures about healthy diets. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Q1 Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both 84
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- QQ8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ies exerts a harmful influence on human beings health has become a fiercely controvers...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ing CO2. In addition, there are a great deal of noise pollution in city, which has a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m to be a solid basis for the claim that living in city does harm to citizens hea...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Living
... be a solid basis for the claim that living in city does harm to citizens health. ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs with it negatives on peoples health. The most oft-cited argument against such...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 523, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... to keep their health since there are a myriad of programs related to health, such as ...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strength...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07874015748 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71042334199 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556430446194 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8872829982 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.823529412 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232060269193 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069160502205 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695823788427 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119531797789 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841327503086 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.