Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
Today, climate change has sparked a considerable public debate that whether should human-beings propose optimum solutions for preventing this issue or finding other habitable planets. Although extreme climate can exert detrimental effects, some feasible solutions can be utilized to address it.
There are some problems inherent in the rise of climate change. Animals extinction is directly affected by global warming. According to many recent studies, ecologists estimated that approximately 150 to 200 species become extinct every day. On the other hand, along with this issue, human life might be threatened. For example, when one species disappeared, the food chain will become imbalance. Therefore, the human might be the potential prey for carnivores. Mentioned in The Guardian times about the numerous cases that polar bears wandered in human settled areas, finding for food, due to the unprecedented short winter, in the north of both Russia and Canada. In the most tragic anticipation, many scientists claim that, if the two poles completely melted, human civilization has to face with land encroachment, coexisting deathly diseases and famine.
Nevertheless, these mentioned situations can be remedied, provided that some reasonable steps are taken. In the realm of natural study, investigators stated that gas emission from factories has been flaunting its contribution to global warming. Therefore, by reducing the amount of carbon released, extreme natural events can be converted. For instance, we should promote eco-friendly products. Besides, developing a low-carbon economy by using efficient-fuel machines should be imposed in policy to revitalize the dying earth.
In conclusion, climate change is set to make the earth in grave trouble. Tackling this problem will need a join hand effort from all people, and we can make a positive change while seeking for other planets seemed to be futile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Nguyễn Minh Quân | 84 | view |
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Forests are the lungs of the earth Destruction of the world s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 78
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 61
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside big cities. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utions can be utilized to address it. There are some problems inherent in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...existing deathly diseases and famine. Nevertheless, these mentioned situations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...policy to revitalize the dying earth. In conclusion, climate change is set to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62413793103 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88785434793 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668965517241 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2823368412 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112032977362 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361366748825 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418866038927 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694479855324 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267139603548 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.