Some people believe that children who are given pocket money every week have less problems managing money when they become adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The prevalence of pocket money which are provided weekly by their parents among adolescence. Although some people claimed that this trend harms children when they turn to adults, I, however, believe that it is the positive development as it helps them in managing money easily so that they do not worry to confront with any problems come on the way.
One concern in terms of pocket money is that it prevents children from theft vulnerability. This is because if they are imparted sufficient amount once a week through their guardian automatically they feel satisfied after spending some amount. As a result, they are able to save little proportion of that pocket money. In contrast, often children from poor family backgrounds tend to assess to a robbery to fulfil their needs which is generating from lack of pocket money.
Saving and expenses are the other areas of concern. Getting pocket money weekly means adults can do their expenditure accordingly by managing it aside in the form of saving. For example, if the children get pocket money of Rs 250 once a week he knows he has to manage this money for both saving and expenses like Rs 150 and Rs 100 respectively so he will scrupulously spend his amount which he has kept for extra expenses. As a result, they come across with the skill of money managing and due to this habit, it is not difficult for them to deal with any obstacles related to the money in the future.
In conclusion, not only does pocket money deter children to attempt any crime like robbery or theft, but also it inculcates money managing ability in the children. Therefore, I agree children should provide pocket money every week as it is a positive symbol to deal with any problem.
- Many old cities around the world are going through a major process of modernization What are the advantages and disadvantages of modernization 65
- Some people believe that educating children altogether will benefit them.Others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given specialcourses. Discuss those two views 67
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale, while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people choose a career according to the social status and salary it will give them. Others choose a career according to whether they will enjoy the work. So which do you think is the best way to choose career.Give reasons for your answers and include 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76174496644 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.537321085 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53355704698 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.285307284 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373691162746 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148678724012 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732304570282 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253234497869 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578896922541 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.