The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.
The circular charts compare what proportion of female and male executives in Great Britain was involve in 1992.
A quick look at the pie charts is quite enough to make it clear that both feminine and masculine had major contribution in managerial and professional that was under non-manual. However, in manual, general labourers were negligible.
In the analisation of employment patterns for women, managerial and professional and clerical or related were stood at top rank with nearly one third. At the same time, just above one quarter participation was shown through the other manual. Last three involved realm were other non-manual, craft or similar and general labourers that were marginal.
In comparison, with women employment trends, in case of men, more than one third of the whole working placements had taken by the maragerial and professional. In contrary, spectacular slip back (25%) was seen in clerical or related. The percentum of other manual for males was analogous as for females. Craft or similar were emerged with significant increment of one fifth. other non-manual and general labourers were still at last position for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | Sandeep USA | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Sakib | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view |
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. 73
- The bar chart gives the top eight online activities in Slovakia in a given month 89
- The map below show the changes that took place in the town at the seaside resort of Laguna beach between 1950 and 1990 44
- The table below gives information about a restaurant's average sales in three different branches in 2016. 61
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%). 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'involved'.
Suggestion: involved
...nd male executives in Great Britain was involve in 1992. A quick look at the pie cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ith significant increment of one fifth. other non-manual and general labourers were s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, third, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29508196721 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84569891751 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.786828669 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0909090909 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933801144662 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354034624714 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602657317588 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808321913156 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721363524109 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.