The two pie charts give information about the average percentage of expenditure by students at one university from 2000 to 2010.
The two pie charts give information about the average percentage of expenditure by students at one university from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, in both surveyed years, the most significant utilization of students' money was for food and drink and utilities, which together accounted for over half the proportion of expenditure, while holidays and eating out generated the least amount of spending.
It is noticeable that the rate of food and drink consumption remained stable at 29%, which is also the highest ratio in both surveyed years. Meanwhile, the amount of holidays spending maintained the lowest level of total proportion of expenditure, at 5%. The remaining rate that stayed stable in that 10-year period was for sports and cultural activities, with a score of 17%.
It is clear that fewer and fewer people spent their money on clothing, as the bar graphs show a significant downward trend in the quantity of clothing payments, which had dropped from 16% to 5% over 10 years. In contrast, the amount of money spent on utilities (electricity/water) climbed from 21% to 27%, and the rate of eating out expenditure went up to 8%. Lastly, the figure of transport rate had a slight growth, from 8% to 9%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
- The two pie charts give information about the average percentage of expenditure by students at one university from 2000 to 2010 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT AND CONTROLLED BY GOVERNMENTS RATHER THAN PRIVATE COMPANIES TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'utilities'' or 'utility's'?
Suggestion: utilities'; utility's
... contrast, the amount of money spent on utilities electricity/water climbed from 21% to 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84427805517 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4040555826 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277228454469 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154051538085 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.320233994447 0.0843802449381 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281721971825 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.415001580243 0.0819641961636 506% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.