The charts below show local government expenditure in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts give data for how the local government spent their money on the 9 main segments in the years 2000 and 2010. As seen from the graphs, the percentages of money invested in these segments didn’t change much with the biggest pieces belonged to Education in both years and the smallest sections were also Other in 2000 and 2010.
In these two graphs, the 3 biggest parts were always Education, Healthcare and Pensions. The year 2010 had the same proportion in Pensions (19%) as 2000, while the other two biggest segments saw a little decrease in the percentage. As for the smallest segments, the positions were held by Transport, Culture and leisure, and other in both years, although the pieces for the former 2 were slightly bigger in 2010 than 10 years previous, the gaps were not significant (1-2%).
The biggest change seen on the pies is from the proportions of Interest of borrowing, which exactly doubled in size in the 10 years’ time (5% to 10%). And the other significant change is from the segments of Welfare which even though did not become two times bigger like the last sections but also had a 5 % increase in the same amount of time. Along side Education and Healthcare, the money spent on Defence was the third sections that suffered a downsize, from 17% to 14% in a decade.
Overall, the largest amount of money were always spent on Education, Healthcare and Pensions even though the proportion became a bit smaller in the 10-year period. The biggest expand in a decade belonged to Interest on borrowing. Apart from these minor changes, the structure of the pie charts were relatively the same in both years.
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from schools To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 89
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from schools To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: Alongside
... % increase in the same amount of time. Along side Education and Healthcare, the money spe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ce was the third sections that suffered a downsize, from 17% to 14% in a decade. Overall...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, while, apart from, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78596491228 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52728278913 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3835038004 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072711203633 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347429299582 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614592222083 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538697976514 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059647182397 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.